This afternoon, I was doing some work for my ongoing horror movie project, which included a quick stop-in at GetGlue.com, specifically the entry for John Carpenter’s 1978 classic Halloween. While I was reading, I noticed some unusual wording in the synopsis…
The first flick in the trilogy from director John Carpenter, Halloween almost single-handedly invented the 1980s slasher genre…
I read this a couple of times just to make sure I understood it correctly. “Trilogy?” The Halloween trilogy? What on Earth is GetGlue talking about? Who wrote this?
By what possible definition is the Halloween series a trilogy?
Now I admit, I’m a little more anal about my use of the term “trilogy” than most people are. To most people — and to the dictionary — any series of three can rightly be called a trilogy. Personally, I prefer only using the term for a story conceived to be told in three parts, rather than a series that happens to stop after the third installment. So by my definition, the Lord of the Rings series is a true trilogy, whereas the Blade series — to give just one example — is not. And yes, we can start splitting hairs about The Hobbit and whether it counts as part of the LOTR series or as a separate but related story or whatever. That’s not the point. The point is whether you’re as obnoxious about what you call a trilogy as I am or whether you just go by the accepted definition, there is no way to count Halloween as a trilogy.
- Number of Halloween movies, as of this writing: 10.
- Number of Halloween films made with the involvement of John Carpenter: 2
- Number of Halloween films made starring the character of Michael Myers: 9
- Number of Halloween films, excluding the remakes and the weird part III, which doesn’t really count: 7
- Number of Halloween films made before any sort of “reboot” was instituted: 5 (1, 2, 4, 5, 6)
- Number of Halloween films that ostensibly follow Jamie Lee Curtis’s Laurie Strode character: 4 (1, 2, 7, 8 )
- Number of Halloween films in the reboot-remake series: 2
People are saying…